Physics' Toxic Assets...

WELCOME to this Gravimotion's Website Page!
Gravimotion is an alternate to theoretical physics. Gravimotion's main feature is to make sense!

Please forgive, when awkward, the English of this page. English is not the author's native language.

Introduction

The financial world is clobbered with, and in the process of stalling through subprimes, hedge funds, derivatives, toxic assets and what not!
If you do not understand the meaning of these words, even though you heard a lot about them, welcome to the clan of the naive, ignorant victims yet contributors to that very financial crisis!

Question..

Did it ever occur to you that theoretical physics is hampered with toxic assets too?
And did it ever occur to you that these toxic assets are also making physics theories founder and sink in despair, just as the financial world is collapsing under our eyes?

The fact of the matter

Neither physics nor fiction
there is nothing
like
Gravimotion...

The Gravimotion Mechanism Book.

Read all about Gravimotion!
 
Click and get the book!

Theoretical physics is stalling with toxic assets!
Here are a few of physics' theories toxic assets:

Toxic assets in theoretical physics are primarily found under the form of dualities

  1. The wave/particle duality of light is a toxic asset.
    A wave, occupying vast volumes of space, and riding on a great number of discrete elements, cannot physically be identified to a discrete particle.
  2. The duality of space, absolutely empty to allow light waves to travel, yet full of frantic energy in the quantum vacuum is a serious toxic asset!
  3. Another toxic asset, yet ignored by physicists and laypersons alike, is the duality of inertia, as Newton’s inertia law doesn’t take care of rotational inertia... and the latter requires its own equations.
  4. Then the conceptual mismatch that exists between relativity and quantum theories is a huge toxic asset!
    The toxicity resides in the incompatibility of the statistical mathematics, used in quantum theory, and calculus used in relativity. The former deals with finite quanta, the later with so called infinitesimal that are incompatible with the quanta1.
  5. Another well known yet denied as being an incompatible duality is in the ambiguity of uniform motion.
    The constant speed of light is "absolute", while uniform speed is supposed to be "relative" in theoretical physics.
    That incompatibility, is actually the object of Einstein's relativity theories.
    That incompatibility is actually what inspired Einstein!
    Einstein clearly writes that his goal is to render the incompatible (the absolute speed of light and relativity of speed) compatible! Unfortunately Einstein's solution (space-time), renders our concept of time, which at best is elusive to start with, even more abstract and incomprehensible.
  6. Another toxic asset of physics yet is the concept of position in space!
    The concept of position is a fundamental tenet of physics' relativity theory.
    Yet that very same concept of position is forbidden in quantum mechanics!
    Judge for yourself:
    • The quantum mechanics' uncertainty principle excludes the state of position for anything that is in motion.
    • Yet "in reality" (that is in the physical world) everything happens to be in motion along the expansion of the universe!
    Put these 2 together and the outcome is clear! Elemental logic mandates that our "mental concept of position" cannot exist in the "physical world"! Yet who cares about logic? The concept of position still prevails to this day in physics! Relativity is not only based on it, relativity is revered!
    Do not get me wrong, I do not deny relativity's accomplishments! I simply state that relativity doesn't give us a clue on what is reality.
How do physicists deal objectively with these mental contradictions?
Thinking of it physicists may remain objective in contradiction because objectivity has a dual meaning of it's own!
Nowadays the opinion of the majority is objective, objectivity no longer deals with reality (with physical "objects").
This author is convinced that instead of being "incredibly incoherent" Nature is "simply consistent"!

Toxic assets in theoretical physics are also found in the form of intellectual entities that lack collateral physical entity.

  1. Physics concept of time is an incredibly potent toxic asset!
    Time has been established eons ago by who knows who.
    Not even a physical entity, time is essentially based on faith!
    What about that for the science of physics?
  2. Space is as much a toxic asset as time is in physics, as space is as much based on faith as time is!
    There is no proof of existence of space!
  3. The most dangerous toxic asset found in physics theories is very probably our human concept of mass, adopted as is in the theories!
    Ironically the quantum theory might have been on the right track up until Higgs invented the so called Higgs field "or particle", just to satisfy our belief that mass exists!
    Nobody knows what is mass, and should it turn out to be an illusion of our minds that will have catastrophic effects on Newton's and Einstein's mechanical equations. What will become of Einstein's famous mC2 without physical mass2? And what will become of our concept of atomic mass and proton?

These are just a few examples of theoretical physics’ toxic assets; you might think of many more yourself...
Let it be known that these toxic assets are poisoning THEORETICAL PHYSICS ONLY!
Just as real estate properties, agricultural harvests and commercial and industrial buildings, are immune and not destroyed by financial toxic assets, EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS as well as APPLIED PHYSICS are immune to the diseases affecting THEORETICAL PHYSICS.
In any case there is a solution to physics’ theories dilemma, and a very simple one at that!
Believe it or not... all of the above problems are solved in the book advertised here!
And nobody seriously challenged the author yet! That is nobody, other than those who use such inconclusive language as "NO" or "TIME DOES EXIST", claimed his ideas were wrong!
You might be the one... Get the book and give it a try!
Footnote 1:
The quantum theory might make sense should it limits itself to the study of phenomenon involving large quantities of quanta, avoiding studying altogether the behavior of individual quantum and particle.
Note that that has been the use Planck (the father of the quantum theory) to start with made of the quanta! Planck's calculations involves populations of quanta and not individuals.
Footnote 2:
In accordance with Gravimotion's interpretation of nature, there is a solution to that dilemma, exposed in What is mass?

Return to top of page

Contact us at: e-ditor[at]gravimotion.com Subject: gravimotion. Any other subject is not considered and disregarded.
Copyright © by Henri Salles. You have the permission to reproduce, print, distribute and post the contents of this website, provided you mention proper citation and acknowledgment: www.Gravimotion.info or the link: http://gravimotion.info